Home
Site Search
Donate
Homepage
About Us
Odious Debts Online
What are odious debts?
Odious debts campaigns
News articles
Legislation and precedents
Corruption
Publications
Essays and reports
Links
Join Us
Site Map
The Third World's Odious Debt
The South makes compelling moral arguments to cancel its foreign debts. But, it also has an indisputable legal case because the overwhelming majority of those debts are odious in law.
"If a despotic power incurs a debt not for the needs or in the interest of the State, but to strengthen its despotic regime, to repress the population that fights against it, etc., this debt is odious for the population of all the State."
- Alexander Sack, 1927
In 1927, Alexander Sack the world's pre-eminent legal scholar on public debts, defined the Doctrine of Odious Debts, which remains the ultimate legal source on that subject. The Doctrine of Odious Debts, though now 70 years old, helps bring clarity to today's complicated Third World debt situation, and fairness to a tragedy in which innocent Southern citizens pay, and corrupt and negligent borrowers and lenders get away scot-free.

News articles - Chad

Printer friendly version                        Send to a Friend

Odious Debts Online    March 26/2008

Chad's checkmate  

Chad's President Idriss Deby has leveraged a state of emergency after a rebel attack on the country's capital to "sweep aside" World Bank controls and bolster military spending, reports Reuters.

Reuters quotes an anonymous independent analyst who estimates "seventy percent of Chad's oil revenues" earmarked for health and education will now go "directly to President Deby," while the World Bank "can do nothing, their role has become almost nil in Chad."

The World Bank made Chad's oil production possible by backing the construction of a pipeline from landlocked Chad to the Cameroon coast. According to a report by Canada's The Globe and Mail:

"As a condition for its support, the World Bank insisted on the implementation of safeguards on oil revenues from the project, meaning that most of the money that Chad receives from oil production was supposed to be either saved up or used on health, education and infrastructure.

"That system hasn't exactly worked as expected. A $4-million (U.S.) advance received by the country on forthcoming oil revenues in 2000 was immediately spent on buying arms, in contravention of the World Bank agreement. In addition, regulators have said that the country simply doesn't have the infrastructure in place to implement the law that manages the country's petroleum revenue, and there's little information showing where the money is actually going."



Argentina | Canada | Indonesia | Lesotho | Nigeria | South Africa | U.K.
Export Credit Agencies | Multilateral Development Banks | The Doctrine of Odious Debts
Homepage | Links | Join Us | Contact Us