Home
Site Search
Donate
Homepage
About Us
Odious Debts Online
What are odious debts?
Odious debts campaigns
News articles
Legislation and precedents
Corruption
Publications
Essays and reports
Links
Join Us
Site Map
The Third World's Odious Debt
The South makes compelling moral arguments to cancel its foreign debts. But, it also has an indisputable legal case because the overwhelming majority of those debts are odious in law.
"If a despotic power incurs a debt not for the needs or in the interest of the State, but to strengthen its despotic regime, to repress the population that fights against it, etc., this debt is odious for the population of all the State."
- Alexander Sack, 1927
In 1927, Alexander Sack the world's pre-eminent legal scholar on public debts, defined the Doctrine of Odious Debts, which remains the ultimate legal source on that subject. The Doctrine of Odious Debts, though now 70 years old, helps bring clarity to today's complicated Third World debt situation, and fairness to a tragedy in which innocent Southern citizens pay, and corrupt and negligent borrowers and lenders get away scot-free.

News articles - Lesotho

Printer friendly version                        Send to a Friend

The Globe and Mail (Canada)   March 16/2004

Acres' Lesotho woes continue   by John Saunders

Acres International Ltd., already convicted in an African bribery case, could be barred from World Bank-financed projects for corruption, the bank confirmed yesterday. It would be the first major international engineering firm to suffer that shame.

The Washington-based development agency disclosed four things: Its investigations unit reopened a probe of Acres' conduct after the Oakville, Ont.-based firm was found guilty in 2002 of bribing the former head of a bank-assisted water project in the impoverished mountain kingdom of Lesotho.

That probe, which examined evidence from the Lesotho trial, is now complete. The investigations unit has sent undisclosed recommendations to the bank's sanctions committee, which can impose penalties ranging from a reprimand to temporary or permanent debarment. The sanctions committee, to which Acres can make written or oral arguments, has sent the company a notice that its debarment case has been reopened.

With assets of $230-billion (U.S), the World Bank is a giant among development agencies and a major indirect employer of engineers. It posts the names of many barred firms and individuals on its Web site, but none as prominent as Acres so far.

Acres president Tony Hylton said it was too soon to guess what the committee's decision will be.

"The company's gone through an awful lot over the last couple of years with the Lesotho incident and what we're looking to do is co-operate as fully as we possibly can with the World Bank and try to move forward and get this behind us as soon as possible," he said.

Acres did about $21-million worth of work on the Lesotho project and was found guilty on two bribery counts involving about $680,000 (Canadian) paid into the Swiss bank accounts of a local agent and his wife. Much of the money ended up in the hands of project chief Masupha Sole, who was jailed for 18 years for accepting the equivalent of $1.5-million in bribes from various contractors and consultants, some of whom also have been convicted.

In an appeal last year, Acres won a reversal of its conviction on one count involving about $180,000 and saw its fine reduced to $2.8-million from $4.2-million. The company had protested its innocence and suggested the Lesotho court was unfit to handle such a complex case.

"We think that findings were somewhat flawed," Mr. Hylton said yesterday, "but we've nevertheless agreed to pay the fine as part of our commitment to being a good corporate citizen. We just want to move on with it. We've paid a heavy price and what we're trying to do is take an industry lead in promoting honest and ethical business practices." Acres has put in place a new "business integrity management system," he said.

Damian Milverton, a World Bank communications officer, said it is unclear how quickly the sanctions committee will reach a decision but the investigators' recommendations will remain secret in the meantime.

"The investigations unit looks at the evidence and it then basically formulates a view on that evidence and recommends to the sanctions committee what should be done next. . . . If this were a court process, the investigations unit would be the prosecutors and the sanctions committee would be the judge."



Argentina | Canada | Indonesia | Lesotho | Nigeria | South Africa | U.K.
Export Credit Agencies | Multilateral Development Banks | The Doctrine of Odious Debts
Homepage | Links | Join Us | Contact Us